<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk:80/handle/2031/5383">
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk:80/handle/2031/5383</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk:80/handle/2031/6505" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk:80/handle/2031/6504" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk:80/handle/2031/6134" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk:80/handle/2031/6133" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2013-04-30T20:35:34Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk:80/handle/2031/6505">
    <title>Growth model of online friendship and individual, dyadic, and network determinants</title>
    <link>http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk:80/handle/2031/6505</link>
    <description>Title: Growth model of online friendship and individual, dyadic, and network determinants
Authors: Zhang, Lun ( 張倫)
Abstract: ﻿The online social networking sites (SNSs), which have rocketed from technique engaging 
niche users into a dominant online communication platform engaging millions of users, may 
change the pattern of online interpersonal communication. The study found that dyadic 
characteristics and structural factors largely determined the behavior of friendship formation, 
rather than characteristics of users. 
The data of the current study are collected from one of the largest SNS platforms in 
China, coving the first two years (2006-07) since its inception, during which time most users of 
the SNS were college students. The dataset records an anonym zed ID, demographic 
characteristics, a list of bidirectional friends and the time of the friendship formation. In total, 10 
million users and 200 million bidirectional ties are involved. 
Using polynomial logistic regression to fit the time path of friendship formation for each 
individual user, the study finds that the increase in the number of friends for each user typically 
follows a Logistic function with time, indicating that the growth of friends starts slowly at the 
beginning, speeds up rapidly after reaching a critical point, and then tapers off finally. More 
importantly, the trajectories appear uniformly, if not identically, across individuals who joined 
the social network at quite different points in time, suggesting a high degree of regularity in user 
behavior when forming friendship. 
This study further examines the growth trajectory of friendship of the entire SNS, and 
compares the resulting of global-level trajectory with the individual-level trajectories. 
Surprisingly, there emerges a strong self-similarity in the growth of friendship between the individual level and the global level, which reinforces the regularity of social friendship 
formation behavior. 
Although users show a similar time path of adding friends, there are substantial 
differences across individuals in the sheer size of their friendship networks. As the second 
research objective, the study examines the effects of three sets of factors, including 
characteristics of network structure, characteristics of dyadic friendship, and characteristics of 
individual users, on the likelihood of the friendship formation. 
Of the factors under study, Balance Structure and the Cohesiveness of User's Ego 
Network (which involves the user as the "ego-center" and only directly-related friends as other 
members of the network) are the two most dominant factors influencing the tie formation. 
Contrary to the prevailing theory of "Preferential Attachment" in the previous literature, 
friendship formation is positively related to Homophily of Degree (i.e, number of friends), which 
means that people make friends with similar (rather than famous) others. In addition, the 
Popularity of the user and his/her Experience with using the SNS has a negative effect on 
friendship formation, i.e., users with higher popularity or longer SNS using history are less likely 
to add new friends. Likewise, Homophily of Experience has also a negative effect on friendship 
formation in that users become increasingly inclined to establish friendship with those with 
different duration of experience with the SNS (i.e., veteran users are more likely to add new 
comers whereas new comers more likely to team up with veterans), which suggests that 
friendship formation is a dynamic process throughout which users change their friendship 
strategies over time. Finally, individual characteristics, such as Sex and level of online Self-Disclosure, do not have any significant effect on the tie formation, which in fact strengthens the 
importance of structural factors reported above. 
The findings of structural effects on friendship formation sheds some lights on social 
media marketing in the sense that online marketers could choose marketing information initiators 
according to users network positions, rather than users SNS usage frequency or motivation. In 
addition, this study also has some practical implications on SNS operators. Considering the 
strategy of retaining user loyalty, SNS operators should focused more on the friendship 
maintenance, such as encouraging the creation of user generated contents and developing tools to 
facilitate information sharing, rather than simply encouraging friendship formation since most 
users will stop adding new friends after they reach their saturation point.
Notes: CityU Call Number: HM742 .Z44 2011; x, 181 leaves : ill.   30 cm.; Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of Hong Kong, 2011.; Includes bibliographical references (leaves 117-135)</description>
    <dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk:80/handle/2031/6504">
    <title>Manufacturing professional honor : journalism award institution as social control in China</title>
    <link>http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk:80/handle/2031/6504</link>
    <description>Title: Manufacturing professional honor : journalism award institution as social control in China
Authors: Huang, Shunming ( 黃順銘)
Abstract: ﻿This dissertation investigates China‟s journalism award institution and its practice from the perspective of social control. It makes a central argument that the party-state enacts social control over news people by manufacturing journalism awards within the institutional framework of state corporatism. State corporatism explains the top-down control over official journalism awards, characterized by the strong vertical interactions (between peak organizations and their local members) on the one hand, and the weak or even lack of horizontal interactions (among local professional organizations at the same levels) on the other. 
The argument is elaborated as six dimensions: institutionalization, historical icon, opportunity structure, gatekeeping, ritual, and professional elites. Chapter 2 traces the history in which journalism awards were established as a formal institution of professional honor at the turn of the 1980s, alongside social transformation from the Maoist to post-Mao era. The clampdown on the democracy movement in 1989 marked a watershed, witnessing the tightening of control. Chapter 3 investigates how certain journalists were iconized as journalism awards. By placing these icons back into the historical contexts, the chapter uncovers the vicissitudes of their living and posthumous reputations, and their posthumous images constructed by the collective memory. Present-day news people neither identify uncritically with officially designated icons nor accept official professional interpellations at face value. Chapter 4 shows that official journalism awards have invented a set of institutional mechanisms to shape and manage the opportunities of professional honors, resulting in a particularistic type of opportunity structure. Chapter 5 performs a preliminary analysis of the gatekeeping practice. The judges sitting on the award committees are typically power-oriented and produce symbolic orders of honor that satisfy the propaganda authorities. Chapter 6 examines the ritual of official and non-official award ceremonies. Chapter 7 paints a quantitative portrait of the Changjiang &amp; Taofen Award winners. Chapter 8 summarizes four basic social-control functions of journalism awards: indexing, purification, demonstration effect, and co-optation. It also reflects on three sets of relations revolving around journalism awards, to wit, press control and honorary control, journalism awards and journalistic excellence, and journalism award and media marketization. 
In sum, official journalism awards in China represent a state-corporatist model of professional honors, distinctive sharply from such professional-community models as the Nobel Prize, the Pulitzer Prize, and the Academy Award.
Notes: CityU Call Number: PN5367.A87 H83 2011; viii, 220 leaves : ill.   30 cm.; Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of Hong Kong, 2011.; Includes bibliographical references (leaves 195-220)</description>
    <dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk:80/handle/2031/6134">
    <title>Coorientation between Hong Kong and mainland journalists on the integration of Hong Kong and mainland China</title>
    <link>http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk:80/handle/2031/6134</link>
    <description>Title: Coorientation between Hong Kong and mainland journalists on the integration of Hong Kong and mainland China
Authors: Yan, Yan (嚴妍)
Abstract: ﻿Hong Kong and Mainland China have undergone a difficult and painful process 
of integration since the British colony's handover to China under an unprecedented 
structure of "one country, two systems." Decades of separation has embedded in 
people in both societies different perceptions and orientations of each other, which 
have played a salient role in the integration process. Given the stringently controlled 
intra-country border, Hong Kong and Mainland Chinese journalists who are 
responsible for constructing realities of both societies on a daily basis stand out as key 
players in "coorientation. 
This study examined the perceptions and mutual perceptions of Hong Kong and 
Mainland journalists on four issues that are central to the integration of the two 
societies: the national identity of Hong Kong people, the political governance of Hong 
Kong, the Hong Kong-Mainland economic integration, and the perception of each 
other's general images. Based on the coorientation theory and previous 
coorientational studies, this study attempted to examine the coorientation patterns of 
two parallel groups of journalists from two interrelated but distinct societies. 
A questionnaire survey was conducted on a total of 323 journalists in Beijing 
(221) and Hong Kong (102). Questions were designed to examine the respective 
perception and estimated perception of the two groups on the same issues using the 
measurements of agreement (between perceptions of the two groups), congruency 
(between one group's perception and estimated perception) and accuracy (between 
one group's perception and the other group's estimated perception). The study found 
that the two groups of journalists demonstrated disagreement, incongruence and 
inaccuracy on most issues. 
On the cultural dimension of Hong Kong people's national identity, the result 
showed that the Hong Kong journalists held a strong "Hong Kong" identity. Although 
they identified with the cultural aspect of the national identity, they did not hold such 
an identity as strongly as their Mainland counterparts, and they also underestimated 
the Mainland side's strong affiliation. By contrast, the Mainland journalists accurately estimated the Hong Kong side's weaker agreement and reservations on this issue. On 
the political dimension of Hong Kong people's national identity, the two groups had 
fundamental disagreement with each other and estimated the other group to hold 
different perceptions from their own. 
On Hong Kong's political governance and specifically on the democratic prospect 
of Hong Kong under China's sovereignty, the two groups took opposite stands, with 
the Mainland side being optimistic whereas the Hong Kong side pessimistic. They 
estimated the other group to hold a different perception. The Mainland side 
underestimated Hong Kong's pessimism while the Hong Kong side expected little 
from the Mainland side on its support for this issue. 
On Hong Kong-Mainland economic integration, the two groups demonstrated a 
pattern of dissensus coorientation state in that they had an accurate knowledge of the 
other side's perception but didn't agree with each other. 
On perception of each other's general images, the Mainland journalists 
overestimated the Hong Kong side's agreement to the positive descriptions of 
Mainlanders" whereas the Hong Kong journalists underestimated the Mainland's 
positive impression of the Hong Kong people. 
This study contributes to the literature of coorientation by applying the theory to a 
broader cross-cultural context and adding new patterns to coorientation state systems. 
The conceptual framework it has tested can be applied to the general public at large 
and other social contexts.
Notes: CityU Call Number: PN5369.H62 Y34 2009; xi, 260 leaves   30 cm.; Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of Hong Kong, 2009.; Includes bibliographical references (leaves 228-248)</description>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk:80/handle/2031/6133">
    <title>National elite media discourses on globalization : comparing China with India</title>
    <link>http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk:80/handle/2031/6133</link>
    <description>Title: National elite media discourses on globalization : comparing China with India
Authors: Song, Jing (宋晶)
Abstract: ﻿In the age of globalization, nation states have to negotiate with the neo-liberal world 
order, articulating national interest on the one hand and preserving national identity and 
sovereignty on the other. National media draw a world map for ordinary people and 
explain the relationship between globalization and their lives. Therefore one important 
way of examining the international discursive contestation is to look through national 
media's prisms to explore how the state acts as the repository of national interest. Chinese 
and Indian elite media discourses offer an illuminating pair for case comparison. This 
study attempts to investigate the differences between national media construction of 
globalization in China and India. 
Theoretically, this thesis argues that national media discursive construction is shaped 
and influenced by the national interest as defined by state elites located in a larger 
international political economy. Empirically, this study compared 1,004 editorials of 
three national newspapers-- the People's Daily, the Global Times, and the Hindu-- from 
1996 to 2006. Besides, 185 editorials from 2000 to 2006 from the Times of India were 
included for further comparison. Content analysis and discourse analysis were applied; 
the former acts as the prelude to the latter. This study aimed to answer three research 
questions. (1) What is China and India located in the international political economy? (2) 
How do Chinese and Indian media construct globalization in line with these contexts? (3) 
What explain the similarities and differences in their media constructions? 
Content analysis revealed that the media in the two countries take a positive attitude 
towards globalization. Two media frames were prominent in referencing "globalization: 
namely, the "Interest" frame and the "Identity" frame. According to the two frames, I 
unpacked globalization into four issues: the international issues and the benefit-cost in the 
neo-liberal world order; the domestic conflicts and the contestation among various groups 
within state; the continuity and discontinuity between history and globalization; the 
boundary of the "other" and "us" and the construction of the others. 
The study finds that the Chinese media believe that China should accommodate to 
the global world in terms of economic development, but politically to fight against 
western hegemony to preserve China's autonomy and legitimacy. The Indian media focus more on military and security issues in the region and sub-continent; they hold a more 
critical attitude towards the international trade order than do the Chinese media. On the 
internal conflict issues that may arise from globalization, the Chinese media deemphasize 
the ill effects of globalization on disadvantaged groups; they emphasize overall national 
interests rather than specific interest of civil society and the people. The Indian media 
criticize the government for policy failure, where globalization is concerned, to take care 
of bad influences on people's lives. 
The study also finds that the Chinese media emphasize the historical continuity as if 
globalization provides a golden opportunity for China's rise to great-power status and to 
revive the past glory of Chinese civilization. In contrast, the Indian media emphasize the 
historical discontinuity and seldom refer to the splendid Indian history. At the same time, 
the Chinese media accept the U.S.'s domination in the global trade and economic system, 
and overlook the role of other developing countries. The Indian media mainly criticize 
the U.S. for hurting India's economy and military security, but hold a mixed feeling 
toward other third world countries. 
The study concludes that the Chinese and Indian media apply different frames in 
globalization discourse. The Chinese media approach globalization issues mainly in an 
interest frame, paying attention to economic development which can bolster elite power 
and save the Party from legitimacy crisis. The Indian media's construction of 
globalization is more identity-based and critical-oriented. China's economic reform has 
produced wealth for the elite, strengthened the regime's legitimacy, and stimulated 
national pride. In contrast, the Indian government's neoliberal policies are more often 
criticized because the ambivalent colonial history has shaped an uncertain national 
identity, and thus an ambiguous media attitude towards globalization.
Notes: CityU Call Number: P96.L342 C66 2010; x, 190 leaves   30 cm.; Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of Hong Kong, 2010.; Includes bibliographical references (leaves 174-190)</description>
    <dc:date>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

