Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk/handle/2031/3565
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, Mung Yu | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-08-30T09:02:44Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-19T08:46:14Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-12T06:39:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2006-08-30T09:02:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-19T08:46:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-12T06:39:44Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.identifier.other | 2006sscmy525 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://144.214.8.231/handle/2031/3565 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: This study examined the best friendships of aggressive, rejected, victimized, and normative adolescents. Methods: One thousand four hundred and thirty participants completed questionnaires and were categorized into different subgroups (i.e., proactive vs. reactive aggressors, aggressive vs. passive victims). The Friendship Quality Questionnaire was used to assess participants’ friendship quality with their best friends. Structural interview was carried out to examine the quality and quantity of their best friendships. Results: In terms of the quality of their friendship, there was no significant difference between aggressive adolescents and non-aggressive adolescents. However, passive victims were found to have significantly lower friendship quality. Differences were found in adolescents’ social problems and social preferences. Discussion: Intervention programs should focus on minimizing aggressive behaviors and victimizations through the use of friendships. Interventions would need to focus on cultivating individual’s friendship skills and helping them to develop quality friendships with their peers. Interventions with different trainings should be designed to different subgroups of high-risk individuals according to their uniqueness. | en |
dc.format.extent | 135 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/html | |
dc.rights | This work is protected by copyright. Reproduction or distribution of the work in any format is prohibited without written permission of the copyright owner. | |
dc.rights | Access is restricted to CityU users. | |
dc.subject | Proactive vs. reactive aggressor | en |
dc.subject | Aggressive vs. passive victims | en |
dc.subject | Friendship quality | en |
dc.subject | Social problem | en |
dc.title | Aggressive, rejected, victimized children and adolescents: a comparison of friendship quality and peer relations | en |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Applied Social Studies | en |
dc.description.discipline | Social Psychology | |
dc.description.supervisor | Dr. Fung Annis Lai Chu | en |
Appears in Collections: | Applied Social Sciences - Undergraduate Final Year Projects - Psychology |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
fulltext.html | 164 B | HTML | View/Open |
Items in Digital CityU Collections are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.