CityU Institutional Repository >
3_CityU Electronic Theses and Dissertations >
ETD - Dept. of Information Systems >
IS - Doctor of Philosophy >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||I-intention and we-intention to contribute to WikiProjects|
|Other Titles: ||Weiji ren wu zhong zhi shi gong xian de ge ren yi yuan he ji ti yi yuan|
|Authors: ||Shen, Xiao Liang Aaron (沈校亮)|
|Department: ||Department of Information Systems|
|Degree: ||Doctor of Philosophy|
|Issue Date: ||2009|
|Publisher: ||City University of Hong Kong|
|Subjects: ||Wikis (Computer science) -- Social aspects.|
|Notes: ||CityU Call Number: HM851 .S539 2009|
ix, 88 leaves : ill. 30 cm.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of Hong Kong, 2009.
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 72-88)
|Abstract: ||The fast advances in social computing technologies have greatly changed the ways in
which people work and collaborate. One prominent example of this ongoing trend is the
rapid growth of wiki-based communities in the past few years. The development and
popularity of online encyclopedia greatly relies on the wisdom of crowds, allowing the
content to be contributed and accessed by anyone at any time around the world. However,
the success of wiki, on the other hand, largely depends on the extent to which people are
willing to donate their time and energy, thus helping the community to grow and prosper.
In this sense, how to recruit a core group of contributors to produce excellent articles
systematically and how to encourage team collaboration for encyclopedic work thus are
some fundamental questions for wiki managers.
One of the distinguishing features of wiki community is its emphasis on the collective
involvement in the creation and maintenance of frequently updated information. The
traditional intention-based models primarily investigated this phenomenon using individual
intention approach in terms of an individual’s own decision to contribute or not. However,
in the context of WikiProjects, the interdependence involved in the joint decision-making
process seems to be more important for explaining the decision to contribute. The
motivation of this study thus is to better understand the causal factors that predict
contributors’ I-intention and we-intention in WikiProjects. This study also investigates the
possible different impacts of I-intention and we-intention on actual knowledge contribution
behavior in WikiProjects.
The research framework incorporates the key constructs from social cognitive theory and social capital theory. In addition, it also draws from the existing philosophical writing on
collective intentionality to better explain contributors’ we-intention in WikiProjects. The
empirical research was conducted in two most largest and famous wiki communities in
Mainland China. An invitation message with a URL to the online questionnaire was sent to
the contributors who had participated in encyclopedic writing in WikiProjects. A follow-up
message was sent four weeks later to assess their actual contribution behaviors. Finally, a
total of 246 usable responses were received and the survey data was analyzed using Partial
Least Squares-Graph Version 3.00. The measurement model was first assessed and then the
structural model was evaluated.
The empirical results of this study support most of the hypotheses proposed in the research
model. In particular, we-intention contributes significantly to actual contribution behavior,
whereas I-intention exerts a significant negative effect on behavior. Joint commitment and
mutual agreement significantly relate to we-intention to contribute but do not exert any
statistically significant effects on individual intention. Generalized trust, pro-sharing norms
and identification play important roles in the formation of both joint commitment and
mutual agreement. In addition, personal outcome expectations and community-related
outcome expectations posit significant direct effects on both I-intention and we-intention to
contribute to WikiProjects.
This study seeks to provide valuable and important insights to both researchers and
practitioners. On the theoretical side, this study contributes significantly to IS research by
discussing the importance and relevance of we-intention in intentional social action,
identifying and empirically testing the potential antecedents of we-intention, developing
and validating some new IS instruments, and advancing the cumulative knowledge of multidisciplinary research on knowledge contribution. On the practical side, the results of
this study also provide some important insights and practical strategies to wiki managers
by discussing the best methods to recruit a core group of dedicated contributors and to
encourage team collaboration for encyclopedic work.|
|Online Catalog Link: ||http://lib.cityu.edu.hk/record=b3008266|
|Appears in Collections:||IS - Doctor of Philosophy |
Items in CityU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.