Skip navigation
Run Run Shaw Library City University of Hong KongRun Run Shaw Library

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk/handle/2031/6379
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNg, Chau Yinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-15T01:51:39Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-19T09:12:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-12T07:29:50Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-15T01:51:39Z
dc.date.available2017-09-19T09:12:17Z
dc.date.available2019-02-12T07:29:50Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.other2011eency844en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://144.214.8.231/handle/2031/6379-
dc.description.abstractIn this century, many aspects involve information transmission in networking system. Not only in computer network, but also society and even biochemistry. Studying opinion spreading dynamics over different network models helps us to understand some phenomena about the world. In this project, a modified model is proposed based on an original rumor spreading model. The modified model simulates multiple opinions (e.g. opinion0, opinion1,..., opinionW) spreading on different network models. Three network models are random graph, small world and scale free network models. The opinion spreading model allows a node to accept or reject, or propagate, or forget opinions. And some opinions have larger chance to be accepted by a node (e.g. the chance of adopting opinion0> that of opinion1>...> that of opinionW). And the project focuses on how 1) network topologies and 2) opinion features affecting the dominance of opinions. Also, we study how 3) initial opinion spreaders affecting time to arrive opinion steady states. The results are as follows: For part 1, high average degree proposes the dominance of opinion0 for random graph and scale free network models. Small link rewiring probability in a small world network supports the dominance of opinionW. For part 2, opinion transmission rate affects the dominance of opinions strongly while the importance of opinion transmission probability is relatively small. For part 3, if initial opinion spreaders have higher centralities, the opinion steady time is usually shorter. Surprisingly, if there is suitable distance between those initial opinion spreaders, although they have a little bit lower centralities, opinion steady process sometimes is faster than that only depends on node centralities one.en_US
dc.rightsThis work is protected by copyright. Reproduction or distribution of the work in any format is prohibited without written permission of the copyright owner.en_US
dc.rightsAccess is restricted to CityU users.en_US
dc.titleModel of opinion spreading and its dynamical studies in complex networken_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Electronic Engineeringen_US
dc.description.supervisorSupervisor: Dr. Tang, K S; Assessor: Prof. Chen, G Ren_US
Appears in Collections:Electrical Engineering - Undergraduate Final Year Projects 

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.html146 BHTMLView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in Digital CityU Collections are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Send feedback to Library Systems
Privacy Policy | Copyright | Disclaimer