Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||A comparative analysis on the avoidance of contract under CISG and PICC|
|Authors:||Leung, Sze Lum (梁思臨)|
|Department:||School of Law|
|Course:||LW6580E International Commercial Contracts and Uniform Sales Law|
|Supervisor:||Dr. Yang, Fan|
|Subjects:||Contracts (International law)|
United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1980 April 11)
International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. UNIDROIT principles of international commercial contracts 2010.
|Citation:||Leung, S. L. (2013). A comparative analysis on the avoidance of contract under CISG and PICC (Outstanding Academic Papers by Students (OAPS)). Retrieved from City University of Hong Kong, CityU Institutional Repository.|
|Abstract:||Avoidance serves as an aggrieved party's most serious remedy. It is not a suitable remedy, except in exceptional situations. In light of CISG-AC Opinion No.5, this paper compares the circumstances under which avoidance of contract may take place under CISG and PICC, and explores how uncertainties arising from the principle of fundamental breach can be tackled.|
|Appears in Collections:||OAPS - School of Law |
Files in This Item:
Items in Digital CityU Collections are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.